Every organisation has to trust that it will see new technology coming in time. But most ways of looking ahead share a weak spot: expert panels are prone to bias, data models mostly look backwards, and the big firms' trend report is read by everyone — including your competitor.
In an action research project, published by IEEE, we developed and tested a method that combines two worlds. Text mining works through stacks of technology reports in a fraction of the time it would cost a person, without favouring the loudest voice in the room. Scenario planning then adds the depth: in a half-day workshop, a team builds four future scenarios around one technology and decides what the organisation should do now.
What the participants reported
- Speed. Trend identification no longer takes weeks — just the time needed to collect the reports.
- Depth. Scenarios force you to take uncertainty seriously, instead of predicting one future and betting on it.
- Repeatability. The approach is a playbook, not a one-off trick. A year later, every participant still rated the workshop 7.5 or higher.
The honest lesson
That same one-year look-back also taught us something uncomfortable: the organisation had not repeated the method. Looking ahead only works as a routine — embedded in the organisation's rhythm, with people trained to run it themselves. One good workshop changes your view; a rhythm changes your organisation.
That is exactly how we see it at KabriTO: not yet another trend report, but the capability to look ahead yourself — periodically and with structure.
The full paper was published by IEEE: Technology Forecasting: Action Research on Integrating Scenario Planning and Text Mining.
Tags
- strategy
- technology
- research
Related
- Advisory
Beyond AI: the SME technology agenda for 2026
While everyone watches AI, 2026 is the year compliance sets the digital agenda for SMEs — with four deadlines that have an actual date.
2 min read
- Education
GenAI in the lecture hall: rules students actually use
Banning fails, and so does a free-for-all. Our research at Leiden University shows what GenAI guidelines look like when students and teachers both accept them.
2 min read
- Advisory
GenAI in 2026: between promise and risk
AI agents now work for hours on their own and costs keep falling — yet lawsuits over fabricated output keep stacking up. The state of play, without hype and without fear.
2 min read